God’s Plan for Iran
Commanders at more than 50 installations told troops the Iran war fulfills biblical prophecy. The theology has a name, a lineage, and a paper trail into the Pentagon.
On Monday, a non-commissioned officer filed a complaint with the Military Religious Freedom Foundation (MMRF). According to the complaint, a combat-unit commander told troops at a briefing that the Iran war is “part of God’s plan” and that President Donald Trump was “anointed by Jesus to light the signal fire in Iran to cause Armageddon and mark his return to Earth.”
Within days, Military Religious Freedom Foundation (MMRF) received over 200 complaints from more than 40 units across more than 50 military installations. Every branch of the military is represented. One NCO emailed on behalf of 15 troops — Christians, a Muslim, and a Jewish service member — stating that the commander’s remarks “destroy morale and unit cohesion and are in violation of the oaths we swore to support the Constitution.”
MRFF founder Mikey Weinstein characterized the reports as commanders expressing “unrestricted euphoria” about a “biblically-sanctioned” war.
This is sourced through a single organization. MRFF has not released the complaints. The Pentagon has not commented.
But the theology described in that complaint — the precise framework in which a military leader frames a war as divine mandate and a president as anointed instrument — is not anonymous. It has a name, a lineage, and a paper trail that leads directly into the Pentagon.
I’ve been documenting it.
The Theology
In Jesus Wept: Two Visions of Jesus Went to War in Minneapolis, I traced a theological lineage that runs from Confederate theologian Robert Lewis Dabney through R.J. Rushdoony — the father of Christian Reconstructionism — to Douglas Wilson, the Moscow, Idaho pastor whose defense of antebellum slavery has been compared to Holocaust denial.
Wilson’s theology teaches that hierarchy is divinely ordained. That masculine authority requires willingness to inflict pain. That empathy is itself sinful — in an April 2024 essay titled “Empathy, Effeminacy, and the Fall of Man,” Wilson argues that Adam’s fundamental flaw was feeling sorry for Eve, that “untethered empathy” is not merely a sin but “the primal sin, the root of all our sin.” Legitimate authority, Wilson writes elsewhere, requires “capacity and willingness to inflict pain.”
This is not fringe theology practiced in rural isolation. Wilson’s church network — the Communion of Reformed Evangelical Churches — operates more than 160 churches across four continents. One of them, Christ Church DC, opened blocks from the Capitol in 2025.
Wilson himself said it plainly: “This is the first time we’ve had connections with as many people in national government as we do now.”
The Secretary of Defense
Pete Hegseth attends a Washington D.C. church planted by Wilson’s network. His Pentagon spokesman, Sean Parnell, confirmed that Hegseth “very much appreciates many of Mr. Wilson’s writings and teachings.”
That appreciation has been visible.
On September 30, 2025, Hegseth addressed nearly 800 generals, admirals, and senior enlisted leaders at Quantico — every commander at one-star and above, ordered to attend. The speech translated Wilson’s theology into military policy: masculine authority, hardened hearts, the warrior ethos as spiritual mandate. “Real toxic leadership,” Hegseth told the assembled brass, “is promoting destructive ideologies that are an anathema to the Constitution and the laws of nature and nature’s God, as Thomas Jefferson wrote in the Declaration of Independence.”
That last clause is doing more work than it appears. “The laws of nature and nature’s God” is the cornerstone of Christian nationalist constitutional theory — the argument that American law derives its authority not from democratic consensus but from divine mandate. By routing it through Jefferson and the Declaration, Hegseth presents theological authority as constitutional originalism. Those who understand God’s law have a duty to enforce it — and that duty is, in this framing, the founding intent.
On his inner bicep: a tattoo reading “Deus Vult” — Latin for “God wills it,” the rallying cry of the First Crusade. In 2021, a DC National Guard anti-terrorism officer flagged Hegseth’s “Deus Vult” tattoo as consistent with insider-threat indicators.
The man with the insider-threat tattoo is now running the Pentagon.
February 18, 2026
Ten days before the Iran strikes began, Hegseth invited Doug Wilson to lead worship services at the Pentagon.
Not a private meeting. Not a social call. Worship services — inside the headquarters of the United States military, led by a pastor whose theological framework holds that legitimate authority requires willingness to inflict pain, that hierarchy is divinely ordained, and that the enforcement of God’s law is the purpose of earthly government.
Constitutional scholars immediately raised Establishment Clause concerns. The First Amendment prohibits the government from establishing religion. A Secretary of Defense inviting his personal pastor to lead worship inside the Pentagon is, at minimum, a church-state boundary that previous administrations treated as inviolable.
The complaints didn’t come from outside the building. They came from inside it.
February 28, 2026
Ten days later, the Iran strikes began. Operation Epic Fury. Regime change targeting. The largest American military offensive since the 2003 invasion of Iraq, according to multiple defense analysts.
I want to be precise about what the timeline does and doesn’t prove. Wilson’s worship service on February 18 and the strikes on February 28 are facts. That they happened ten days apart is a fact. Whether one caused the other is not established, and I am not claiming it did. What the timeline establishes is sequence: Hegseth brought the theology into the Pentagon, and then the war began, and then commanders briefed troops using that theology’s language.
According to over 200 complaints filed with the MRFF this week — from more than 40 units across more than 50 installations, in every branch of the military — combat-unit commanders are briefing troops that this war is part of God’s plan.
The theology described in those complaints is not generic evangelical Christianity. “Anointed by Jesus to light the signal fire” to “cause Armageddon and mark his return to Earth” is specifically premillennial End Times theology — the belief that the world must burn before Christ returns, and that leaders who accelerate the burning are instruments of divine purpose.
Here is what makes this complicated: that is not Doug Wilson’s theology.
On March 2, Wilson posted his own take on the Iran strikes. He supported the operation — but framed it as geopolitics, not eschatology. He wanted Congressional authorization. He warned against nation-building: “We can fire things from our airplanes that can kill an Ayatollah. We have no capacity to use our air power to bring in Iranian versions of Madison, Jefferson or Washington.” He dismissed “doomposting” about World War III and predicted the Abraham Accords would expand.
No Armageddon. No anointed president. No signal fire for the Second Coming.
Wilson is a postmillennialist — he believes Christians build Christ’s kingdom here, gradually, through institutional dominion. His project is not to end the world but to rule it. The commanders briefing troops at over 50 installations are preaching something older and more volatile: the premillennial dispensationalism of white Southern evangelicalism, in which war in the Middle East is a prophetic prerequisite and the destruction of nations is God’s scheduled programming.
These are two different theologies with two different eschatologies — and they are converging inside the same military chain of command. Wilson provides the institutional architecture: the theology of dominion, the willingness to inflict pain, the placement of loyalists in federal positions. The older Southern tradition provides the apocalyptic accelerant: the conviction that this war is not policy but prophecy.
Wilson built the house. Someone else lit the match.
This framework has appeared in American military leadership before.
The Precedent
2003: Lieutenant General William “Jerry” Boykin toured churches in uniform, describing the War on Terror as a spiritual battle. Of a Somali warlord: “I knew my God was bigger than his. I knew that my God was a real God and his was an idol.” An investigation found he had violated some Pentagon rules. He faced no serious discipline.
2004-2005: Air Force Academy scandal. Cadets reported systematic evangelical pressure: mandatory prayer, instructors telling non-Christian students they would “burn in hell.” The head football coach hung a locker-room banner reading “I am a Christian first and last; I am a member of Team Jesus Christ.” An Air Force investigation confirmed the complaints. The academy launched a religious sensitivity program called RSVP. It was opposed by evangelical staff and made little progress. By 2010, 41 percent of non-Christian cadets still reported unwanted proselytizing.
2010: “Jesus rifles.” Trijicon, a Michigan defense contractor, was found to have been stamping New Testament references onto the model numbers of rifle sights used by U.S. troops in Iraq and Afghanistan — same font, same size as the model designation. JN8:12 — “I am the light of the world.” 2COR4:6 — “For God, who said, ‘Let light shine out of darkness,’ made his light shine in our hearts.” The practice had been ongoing for decades. When exposed, the company agreed to stop. MRFF had been filing complaints about it for years.
2015-2019: Mike Pompeo — the architect of “maximum pressure” on Iran — told a church audience at a June 2015 God and Country Rally in Wichita he would fight “until the Rapture.” Four years later, as Secretary of State, he was asked on CBN whether Trump had been “raised for such a time as this, just like Queen Esther, to help save the Jewish people from the Iranian menace.” Pompeo replied: “I certainly believe that’s possible.” The Iran policy now being executed by military force was framed in End Times theology before it was framed as strategy.
That Queen Esther language has resurfaced. In the 48 hours since the strikes began, evangelical influencers have adopted the same Purim-themed framing to describe the timing of the February 28 operation — casting Trump as the biblical figure who saved the Jewish people from an existential Persian threat. It is a bridge between Wilson’s dominion theology, in which a Christian magistrate exercises lawful authority, and the commanders’ prophecy theology, in which a war fulfills biblical precondition. The magistrate and the prophet agree on the war. They disagree on what it means.
In each case, the pattern was the same: End Times rhetoric in military and foreign policy leadership, followed by no meaningful institutional response.
The difference now is scale. In 2003, Boykin was a lieutenant general freelancing his theology in church basements. In 2026, the theology comes from the Secretary of Defense, is taught by his personal pastor inside the Pentagon, and — according to 200 complaints across 50 installations — is being briefed to combat troops as operational doctrine.
The Domestic Precedent
The Iran briefings are not the first time this theology has appeared in the current administration’s operations. In Here Am I, Send Me, I documented how Border Patrol Commander Gregory Bovino used Isaiah 6:8 as a recruitment call — “Here am I. Send me” — while omitting the verse that follows: “Make the heart of this people calloused... until the cities lie ruined and without inhabitant.” DHS spent $100 million on a “wartime recruitment” campaign saturated with apocalyptic imagery, targeting young men through gun shows, UFC events, and esports arenas.
The theology that recruited with scripture domestically is now, according to over 200 MRFF complaints, briefing combat troops that a war is God’s plan.
Please consider subscribing.
It is free, with an option to pay to support the work.
What Is Verified
The MRFF complaints have not been independently confirmed outside of Jonathan Larsen’s reporting. But MRFF — founded in 2005 — has a two-decade track record of filing complaints that are later substantiated: the Air Force Academy scandal, the Jesus rifles, and dozens of other cases. The scale reported here — 200+ complaints, 50+ installations, every branch — is significant. It is also, as of this writing, sourced through a single organization.
What is independently verified:
Pete Hegseth’s Pentagon spokesman confirmed Hegseth admires Wilson’s writings
Hegseth’s Quantico speech articulated Wilson’s theological framework as military policy
Doug Wilson led worship services at the Pentagon on February 18, 2026
Wilson’s theology teaches that legitimate authority requires “capacity and willingness to inflict pain”
Wilson’s church network includes a church whose pastor simultaneously serves as ICE field office director
A DC National Guard anti-terrorism officer flagged Hegseth’s “Deus Vult” tattoo as consistent with insider-threat indicators
Gregory Bovino used Isaiah 6:8 as a recruitment call, omitting the passage about ruining cities
DHS recruitment used apocalyptic imagery and targeted young men with gun culture interests
Iran strikes began February 28, ten days after Wilson’s Pentagon worship service
The MRFF complaint describes a briefing consistent with every one of these documented facts.
What We Don’t Know
Which units? MRFF reports 40+ units across 50+ installations in every branch — but has not disclosed specific units or installations. Independent verification of scope is not yet possible.
Is this briefing sanctioned? Did commanders receive guidance or talking points from above, or is this individual interpretation of a theological atmosphere that Hegseth has cultivated? 200 complaints across every branch suggests something more than isolated freelancing — but “suggests” is not “proves.”
What is the chain between Wilson’s Pentagon worship and operational briefings? The sequence is established — Wilson at the Pentagon, then strikes, then briefings using End Times theology. Whether Wilson’s visit influenced the briefings’ content, or whether commanders independently adopted the theology Hegseth has been modeling, remains unknown.
Has any Congressional oversight body been notified? Congressional response to the Iran strikes has focused on war powers, not religious content. No member of Congress has publicly raised the Establishment Clause implications of combat briefings framing a war as divine mandate.
Commanders or chaplains? The MRFF complaints describe combat-unit commanders delivering these briefings — not chaplains. Military chaplains have latitude to discuss theology with service members who seek them out. Commanders do not. A commander leading religious instruction in a unit briefing is a significant break in military protocol and a potential Establishment Clause violation independent of the content. If the briefings are coming from the chain of command rather than the Chaplain Corps, that distinction matters legally.
Are there recordings or written materials? The difference between a complaint and evidence is documentation. If briefing slides or recordings exist, the story changes fundamentally.
The Question
The question is not whether combat-unit commanders told troops that Iran is part of God’s plan.
The question is whether the Secretary of Defense — who admires Wilson’s writings, who invited Wilson into the Pentagon, who told 800 commanders that military leadership serves “the laws of nature and nature’s God” — created the theological infrastructure that made such briefings inevitable.
That question doesn’t require the MRFF complaints to be verified.
It’s already answered.
Previously in this series:
The Hammer and the Guardrail — How the Defense Production Act became a weapon against AI safety
The Pentagon Banned Claude as a National Security Threat. Then It Used Claude to Bomb Iran. — Same terms, different company
Jesus Wept: Two Visions of Jesus Went to War in Minneapolis — The theological battle
Here Am I, Send Me — How DHS recruited with scripture
Investigative journalism tracking institutional capture — from 4chan to federal power. Free subscribers get every post. Paid subscribers keep the research independent.
"MRFF founder Mikey Weinstein characterized the reports as commanders expressing 'unrestricted euphoria' about a 'biblically-sanctioned' war...." That's just so chilling. We should not be involved in a "Holy war!"
Hegseth & commanders who are on board with this theology are telling God himself when to come back & rule the world. Expecting the Creator of all, God Almighty to basically follow orders.